Caltech Library System

About | Browse | Search | Caltech Student Instructions

Type of Document	Dissertation
Author	Bush, Eliot Christen
Author's Email Address	bush AT uchicago.edu
URN	etd-03292004-144927
Persistent URL	http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechETD:etd-03292004-144927
Title	Evolution and scaling in mammalian brains
Degree	PhD
Option	Biology
Advisory Committee	Advisor Name Title John Allman Committee Chair Masakazu Konishi Committee Member Pietro Perona Committee Member Shinsuke Shimojo Committee Member
Keywords	Primates endocranial volume frontal cortex white matter gray matter
Date of Defense	2004-03-04
Availability	unrestricted
Abstract Here I look at three stages in the evolutionary development of mammalian brains. Chapter one addresses how connectivity in neocortex scales with brain size. This is of evolutionary interest because it helps define the basic mammalian condition. Neocortical white matter increases disproportionately in large brains. This might reflect increases in the number of connections per neuron. It might also reflect scaling in axon diameter. I compare these hypotheses by examining white matter-gray matter scaling in cerebellum. Because the white matter of cerebellum lacks cortico-cortical connections, the connectivity theory predicts that cerebellar white matter should not hyperscale relative to gray matter. I have measured white matter and gray matter volume in a large sample of mammals and I find that cerebellar white matter does not hyperscale. This supports the proposition that neocortical hyperscaling reflects an increase in the number of connections per neuron in large brains. In chapter two I use independent contrasts analysis to examine the scaling of frontal cortex in a large sample of mammals. I find significant differences in scaling between primates and carnivores. Primate frontal cortex hyperscales relative to the rest of neocortex and the rest of the brain, and the primate slope is significantly greater than that for carnivores. This suggests that there are substantial differences in frontal cortex structure and development between the two groups. Combined with with anatomical differences, it suggests that primates have evolved a number of unique adaptations in frontal cortex. Chapter three examines the evolution of brain size in anthropoid primates. Living anthropoids have larger brains than strepsirrhines. What about early anthropoid fossils? I measure brain size in the early anthropoid Parapithecus grangeri using computed tomography. I find that relative to the living anthropoids, Parapithecus had a small brain for its body size. Thus large brains did not develop at the same time as a number of other anthropoid adaptations
Files	Filename       Size       Approximate Download Time (Hours:Minutes:Seconds)     28.8 Modem   56K Modem   ISDN (64 Kb)   ISDN (128 Kb)   Higher-speed Access    eliot-bush-thesis.pdf 1.19 Mb 00:05:30 00:02:49 00:02:28 00:01:14 00:00:06